#P5 COUNTRIES FULL#

7 For this reason, scholars should be careful not to drive a wedge between the production of knowledge in academia and the application of knowledge in diplomatic circles. The arena of UN studies, expanding many fields, is closely tied to the diplomatic arena within the UN. However, research that covers an issue which significantly impacts global security must be attentive to the preferences of nation states. The article does not propose that scholars are obliged to direct their research to fit with the interests of nation states. Subsequently, more research is needed to help explain this inclination.

Consequently, a discrepancy exists between the debates among UN member states, where calls for structural reform make up the majority, 6 and the academic literature covering the topic. This article describes the academic debateвЂ™s historical backdrop and examines more recent contributions to the topic, thereby illustrating that research in support of structural reform of the UNSC has gradually moved from being the prevailing emphasis toward taking up a smaller share of the dialogue.

#P5 COUNTRIES FULL#

4 Nevertheless, little attention has been paid to a full review outlining the academic debate about UNSC reform, 5 while exploring its underlying modes of thinking. This debate has recently been outlined by Bourantonnis, Blum, Swart & Freiesleben, and Gowan & Gordon. 3 UN member states have debated reform since the UNвЂ™s inception. 1 The issue of reform is also one of the United NationsвЂ™ (UN) вЂњgreatest challenges wherein all the difficulties and obstacles of wider institutional reform are collected together in a microcosmвЂќ, 2 and вЂњis regarded by many inside and outside the UN as the most important and urgent issue of UN reform вЂќ. United Nations Security Council ( UNSC) reform is one of the primary issues facing not only the council itself, but the entire field of international security, international relations, and the functioning of the international system at-large.

P5 countries